Microsoft Dynamics 365 localizations by country

How Microsoft Dynamics 365’s researched localization support breaks down by region, across the 56 countries we have data for.

• Northern America2 of 2
• Latin America & Caribbean16 of 34
• Western Europe6 of 9
• Northern Europe9 of 10
• Southern Europe2 of 15
• Eastern Europe4 of 10
• Western Asia & Middle East7 of 18
• Central & Southern Asia1 of 14
• Eastern & South-Eastern Asia6 of 19
• Africa1 of 54
• Oceania2 of 14

Coverage as researched August 2026.

How many countries does Dynamics 365 Finance and Supply Chain Management cover out of the box?

Fifty-six markets are tracked here, including two — Argentina and the United Arab Emirates — that are documented as future rather than current releases. Depth varies widely by market: some pages cover statutory reporting, tax handling and electronic invoicing in detail, while others document little beyond basic invoice setup.

Is electronic invoicing delivered directly, or through a third party?

Both, depending on the market. A single configurable service underpins electronic invoicing everywhere it's documented, but the transmission step varies: several tax authorities — including Germany, Italy, Poland and India — receive submissions directly, while a large share of Latin American markets plus Belgium, Denmark, France's domestic mandate, Mexico, China and Singapore route through a named third-party connector bundled into the same service rather than a direct government link.

Does Finance and Supply Chain Management run payroll?

Not inside the product itself. Payroll lives in the separate Human Resources product, and even there, the built-in United States payroll tax engine was retired in 2024 after Microsoft stopped issuing tax updates; the legacy module still runs but gets no further enhancements, and Microsoft's own guidance points customers toward third-party payroll providers. Every market in this dataset is classified as partner-delivered payroll for that reason.

Is Poland's KSeF system supported?

Yes, and in both directions. Sales, project and advance invoices generate and submit directly to the government system, and supplier invoices can be imported the same way — one of only a handful of markets in this dataset with confirmed two-way, direct-to-government electronic invoicing.

How is Mexico's CFDI requirement handled?

Documents generate and submit through a named certification provider, as Mexican law requires for this obligation, and supplier invoices can be imported the same way. Earlier product guidance described this connection as needing custom work rather than shipping out of the box, so a buyer with a live Mexican entity should reconfirm current behavior before relying on it.

What happens in a country with no documented row here?

Statutory reporting, electronic invoicing, tax determination, payroll and banking support are recorded as not documented rather than treated as evidence the capability is missing — a vendor's silence on a market is not proof it can't be configured there.

Which countries have both outbound and inbound electronic invoicing, not just one direction?

Direction is tracked separately for every electronic-invoicing row because it changes what a buyer can actually do. Germany, Italy, Poland, Belgium, Denmark, France's domestic mandate, Chile, Mexico and Indonesia all document both submitting customer invoices and receiving supplier invoices; most other markets in this dataset document outbound submission only, with no matching inbound task.

Is US sales and use tax calculated automatically?

Yes, through a configurable tax engine built into the product since 2022, covering standard sales and use tax determination. A separate connection point exists for an outside tax-solution provider to handle more advanced use-tax accrual scenarios, so the two routes coexist rather than one replacing the other.

How current is this coverage data?

This reflects the electronic-invoicing coverage tracker dated July 2026 alongside individual market help pages reviewed in August 2026. Mandates shift on their own regulatory timelines, and at least one market (Türkiye) shows conflicting release-status wording across Microsoft's own pages, so a market shown here as available should still be reconfirmed against the current compliance calendar before a go-live date is fixed.