Epes Transport
Transportation · United States · Mid-Market
- Variance Metrics
- 4
- Variance Metrics
- Annual Profit Swing
- $200,000
- Annual Profit Swing
- Implementation Timeline
- 2 months
- Implementation Timeline
Updated July 2026 · By the ERP Research Editorial Team · Independent and vendor-neutral — no vendor pays for placement or ranking.
A transportation management system for Dynamics 365 plans loads, rates and tenders freight to carriers, tracks shipments and audits freight invoices, exchanging order and shipment data with Dynamics. D365 Supply Chain Management includes a Transportation Management module covering rating, routing and freight reconciliation; dedicated TMS platforms add carrier network reach, optimisation depth and real-time visibility.
| Product | Best for | Pricing | Deployment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-market / Enterprise | Quote-based subscription (SaaS), module- and volume-dependent | Cloud | |
| Mid-market / Enterprise | Subscription (quote-based) | Cloud | |
| Mid-market / Enterprise | Subscription (SaaS), quote-based | Cloud | |
| Mid-market / Enterprise | Subscription (SaaS), tailored by volume, users, and modules | Cloud | |
| Mid-market / Enterprise | Quote-based (subscription); no published tiers | Cloud/On-premise | |
| Mid-market / Enterprise | Custom / quote-based (contact sales) | Cloud |
Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management includes a Transportation Management module that handles rate shopping, route planning, load building, appointment scheduling and freight bill reconciliation. It is more than many buyers realise, and F&O customers should scope it properly before assuming they need to buy.
Its practical limitation is the carrier network. Native TMS requires you to configure carriers and rates yourself, whereas commercial platforms arrive with pre-built connections to thousands of carriers and maintain them. For a shipper with a handful of contracted carriers, that difference is minor; for a parcel-heavy or multi-modal operation it is the whole value proposition.
Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management's Transportation Management module supports carrier and rate configuration, rate shopping across configured carriers, route and load planning, appointment scheduling at docks, and freight bill reconciliation against expected costs — natively, using the same order and inventory data as the rest of F&O. Business Central has no equivalent. The gaps against a commercial TMS are carrier network breadth and maintenance, parcel-specific capability including rate shopping across parcel carriers, optimisation sophistication for complex multi-stop or multi-modal networks, and real-time in-transit visibility, which is a separate capability again.
NetSuite
Acumatica
Dynamics 365
SAP+4
SAP
Oracle
Dynamics 365Infor+1
NetSuite
SAP
Dynamics 365
Acumatica+3
SAP
Oracle
Dynamics 365
NetSuite
SAP
Oracle
NetSuite
Dynamics 365+2
SAP
Oracle
NetSuite
Dynamics 365+6Customer stories from the vendors compared above, summarised from their published case studies.
Transportation · United States · Mid-Market
Transportation · United States · Mid-Market
Summarised from each vendor's published customer stories. Figures are the vendor's own claims, not independently verified by ERP Research. Browse all add-on case studies →
A vendor-neutral shortlisting guide to transportation management (TMS): how the 6 systems we track compare on capability, what to check before you sign, and the questions that separate a good fit from an expensive one.
Transportation Management (TMS) Buyer's Guide
6 systems compared · 2026
ERP Research
Most vendors in this category price by quote, so there is no honest list price to quote you. Here is what actually drives your number — and how to get a real one.
5 of the 6 vendors we track in this category publish no list price at all.
List the specific transportation management (TMS) outcomes you need — volumes, workflows, countries, systems in the loop — and rank them. Vendor demos are optimised to reframe your requirements around their strengths; a written list keeps the evaluation yours.
Every vendor here “integrates with Dynamics 365” — the differences are in depth. Ask each to demo the integration against a realistic Dynamics 365 configuration: your entity structure, your fields, your transaction volumes, and what happens when a sync fails.
Look for Microsoft AppSource listing / ISV certification and a current listing on Microsoft AppSource. Certification doesn't guarantee fit, but it confirms the vendor keeps pace with Dynamics 365 releases — uncertified integrations are where upgrade breakage concentrates.
Ask for two reference customers on Dynamics 365 at your size and in your industry, and ask them what broke in the first year. Implementation quality varies more than product quality in the transportation management (TMS) category.
Compare subscription plus implementation plus internal effort — not headline price. Dynamics 365 transportation management pricing models differ (per user, per volume, per entity), so normalise every quote to your actual usage before comparing.
For a shipper with a small set of contracted carriers, straightforward lanes and no parcel complexity, it frequently is — and it avoids an integration entirely. The case to buy builds with carrier count, parcel volume, multi-modal complexity, or the administrative burden of maintaining rate tables yourself. That maintenance question, rather than functionality, is what usually decides it.
A TMS plans and executes — deciding how freight moves, tendering it and settling the invoice. A visibility platform tracks freight already in motion by aggregating carrier telematics and EDI, predicting arrival times and flagging exceptions. They complement rather than replace each other, and buying visibility while expecting planning capability is a common and avoidable disappointment.
Sales orders, purchase orders and shipment data flow from Dynamics for planning; shipment costs, tracking and freight invoices flow back for accrual, settlement and landed cost. F&O uses Dataverse and OData; BC uses its API. Scrutinise the financial write-back — freight accrual and settlement posting cleanly into Dynamics is where these implementations most often overrun their scope.
This comparison currently covers 6 options that work with Dynamics 365, including Descartes Transportation Management, e2open Transportation Management, FreightPOP. Each links to a detailed profile with features, integrations, pricing and alternatives, and the directory is updated as the market changes.
Most vendors here quote rather than publish. Tell us your Dynamics 365 version, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what it should cost — and which options are worth quoting against each other.