Skip to content
E
ERPResearch

Epicor Kinetic vs Infor M3

Side-by-side comparison of Epicor Kinetic and Infor M3 — features, pricing, modules, and deployment options.

Epicor Kinetic vs Infor M3 at a Glance

CriteriaEpicor KineticInfor M3
Best ForDiscrete and mixed-mode manufacturersProcess manufacturers (food, chemicals, pharma) needing batch/formula control
Starting Price$80/user/moCustom quote
Pricing Modelper-usercustom
Deploymentcloud, on-premise, hybridcloud, on-premise
Company Size51-250, 251-1000, 1001-5000251-1000, 1001-5000, 5000+
Implementation5–10 months8–15 months
Typical Cost$100K–$500K$250K–$1.5M

Module Comparison

ModuleEpicor KineticInfor M3
Finance & Accounting★★ Moderate★★★ Strong
Manufacturing★★★ Strong★★★ Strong
Supply Chain★★★ Strong★★★ Strong
CRM★★ Moderate Basic
HR & Payroll★★ Moderate★★ Moderate
Project Management★★ Moderate Basic
Inventory Management★★★ Strong★★★ Strong
Procurement★★★ Strong★★★ Strong
Warehouse Management★★ Moderate★★★ Strong
Ecommerce Basic Basic
Business Intelligence★★ Moderate★★ Moderate
Quality Management★★★ Strong★★★ Strong
Field Service★★ Moderate N/A
Asset Management★★ Moderate★★★ Strong

Pros & Cons

Epicor Kinetic

Pros

  • +Deep manufacturing capabilities (MES, APS, quality)
  • +Strong shop floor control and production scheduling
  • +Good fit for make-to-order and engineer-to-order
  • +Modern Kinetic UI with browser-based access

Cons

  • -Financials not as strong as SAP or Oracle
  • -Ecommerce and retail modules are limited
  • -Customisations can be complex to upgrade
  • -Reporting relies heavily on SSRS — can feel dated

Infor M3

Pros

  • +Excellent batch management, formula control, and traceability
  • +Strong fit for food & beverage with FDA/HACCP compliance
  • +Deep warehouse management and supply chain planning
  • +Proven scalability for multi-plant operations

Cons

  • -CRM is very basic — most companies integrate externally
  • -No field service module
  • -Steep learning curve and complex configuration
  • -Fewer implementation partners than tier-1 ERPs

When to Choose Epicor Kinetic

  • You need an ERP best suited for discrete and mixed-mode manufacturers
  • Your company has 51-250 or 251-1000 or 1001-5000 employees
  • You operate in Manufacturing, Automotive, Aerospace & Defense
  • You prefer cloud / on-premise / hybrid deployment
  • Your budget aligns with $80/user/mo starting price

When to Choose Infor M3

  • You need an ERP best suited for process manufacturers (food, chemicals, pharma) needing batch/formula control
  • Your company has 251-1000 or 1001-5000 or 5000+ employees
  • You operate in Food & Beverage, Pharmaceuticals, Manufacturing
  • You prefer cloud / on-premise deployment

What Users Say

20,000+ manufacturers rely on Epicor — a leader in discrete manufacturing ERP

Trusted by leading food & pharma manufacturers for batch traceability and compliance

Industry Fit Analysis

IndustryEpicor KineticInfor M3
ManufacturingPrimaryPrimary
Food & BeverageSecondaryPrimary

Company Size Fit

Company SizeEpicor KineticInfor M3
1–50 employees
51–250 employees
251–1000 employees
1,001–5000 employees
5,000+ employees

Other ERP Comparisons

Explore Each Vendor

All Epicor Kinetic Resources

All Infor M3 Resources

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Epicor Kinetic better than Infor M3?

It depends on your business needs. Epicor Kinetic is best for discrete and mixed-mode manufacturers, while Infor M3 is best for process manufacturers (food, chemicals, pharma) needing batch/formula control. Epicor Kinetic starts at $80/user/mo and Infor M3 starts at custom pricing.

How does Epicor Kinetic pricing compare to Infor M3?

Epicor Kinetic uses a per-user pricing model starting at $80/user/mo, while Infor M3 uses a custom model. Epicor Kinetic typical total cost is $100K–$500K vs $250K–$1.5M for Infor M3.

Which is better for manufacturing: Epicor Kinetic or Infor M3?

Both vendors serve manufacturing companies. Epicor Kinetic is typically chosen by 51-250, 251-1000, 1001-5000 employee organizations, while Infor M3 targets 251-1000, 1001-5000, 5000+ employee companies. Consider your company size and specific module needs to decide.

How long does it take to implement Epicor Kinetic vs Infor M3?

Epicor Kinetic typically takes 5–10 months to implement, while Infor M3 takes 8–15 months. Implementation time depends on module scope, data migration complexity, customisation requirements, and organisational readiness.

What modules does Epicor Kinetic have that Infor M3 doesn't?

Epicor Kinetic offers Field Service which Infor M3 does not have. Compare both systems' full module strengths in the comparison table above.

Can I migrate from Epicor Kinetic to Infor M3?

Yes, migration from Epicor Kinetic to Infor M3 is possible and is a common path in the ERP market. Key considerations include data migration (master data, transactional history), process re-mapping, user retraining, and integration reconfiguration. Most migrations take 4–12 months with an experienced implementation partner. We recommend engaging an independent ERP consultant to assess migration scope.

Which ERP is better for small businesses: Epicor Kinetic or Infor M3?

Epicor Kinetic is better suited for small businesses, targeting 51-250, 251-1000, 1001-5000 employee companies with pricing starting at $80/user/mo. Infor M3 primarily serves 251-1000, 1001-5000, 5000+ employee organisations and may be over-engineered and over-priced for small businesses.

Related Resources

Need a personalized recommendation?

Tell us about your business and we'll help you shortlist the best ERP systems for your needs.

Join 2,000+ companies using ERP Research to find their ideal ERP