FIS Treasury and Risk Manager (Quantum) vs Nomentia
treasury & cash management head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Quote-based | Quote-based |
| Deployment | Cloud, On-premise | Cloud |
| Company size | Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud | NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud |
| Vendor | FIS | Nomentia |
Our take
Where FIS Treasury and Risk Manager (Quantum) leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 15 of the 32 capabilities where they differ (led by derivatives & financial instrument management and hedge accounting).
Where Nomentia leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 17 of the 32 capabilities where they differ (led by host-to-host and api bank connectivity and intercompany netting & settlement).
- Stated NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where they differ
The 32 capabilities (of 59 in the treasury & cash management taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Host-to-host and API bank connectivityPayments & Bank Connectivity | Not evidenced | Core strength 10,000+ managed bank connections via Nomentia Connect |
| Derivatives & financial instrument managementRisk & Financial Instruments | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Hedge accountingRisk & Financial Instruments | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Mark-to-market valuation & reportingRisk & Financial Instruments | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Debt and borrowings managementDebt, Investment & In-House Banking | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Intercompany netting & settlementDebt, Investment & In-House Banking | Not evidenced | Core strength |
| Generative-AI natural-language queriesPlatform, AI & Integrations | Core strength Treasury GPT AI assistant | Not evidenced |
| Bank statement aggregationCash & Liquidity Management | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Multi-currency, multi-entity cash reportingCash & Liquidity Management | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Automated bank reconciliationCash & Liquidity Management | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Intercompany / group cash visibilityCash & Liquidity Management | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Scenario modelling & what-if analysisCash Forecasting | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Forecast vs actual variance analysisCash Forecasting | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Multi-bank payment formats & routingPayments & Bank Connectivity | Not evidenced | Supported |
| SWIFT connectivityPayments & Bank Connectivity | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Payment format transformation libraryPayments & Bank Connectivity | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Cross-border and multi-currency paymentsPayments & Bank Connectivity | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Payment fraud detectionFraud Prevention & Compliance | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Segregation of duties controlsFraud Prevention & Compliance | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Audit trails & controls reportingFraud Prevention & Compliance | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Interest-rate risk managementRisk & Financial Instruments | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Commodity risk managementRisk & Financial Instruments | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Exposure aggregation & simulationRisk & Financial Instruments | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Investment portfolio managementDebt, Investment & In-House Banking | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Interest calculation & allocationDebt, Investment & In-House Banking | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Configurable dashboards & KPIsTreasury Accounting & Reporting | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Regulatory & compliance reportingTreasury Accounting & Reporting | Supported | Not evidenced |
| AI-assisted analytics & insightsPlatform, AI & Integrations | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Real-time cash positioningCash & Liquidity Management | Supported | Core strength |
| Liquidity planningCash & Liquidity Management | Core strength Liquidity Hub aggregates ERP and bank API data | Supported |
| Centralised payment processing hubPayments & Bank Connectivity | Supported | Core strength |
| In-house bankingDebt, Investment & In-House Banking | Supported | Core strength |
Both grade identically on the other 27 capabilities — see each product's full profile: FIS Treasury and Risk Manager (Quantum), Nomentia.
FIS Treasury and Risk Manager (Quantum) vs Nomentia — FAQs
Is FIS Treasury and Risk Manager (Quantum) or Nomentia better for ERP integration?
Both state integrations with SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud. Nomentia additionally lists NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365. Always verify the connector against your ERP version with a reference customer.
Which is cheaper, FIS Treasury and Risk Manager (Quantum) or Nomentia?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what FIS Treasury and Risk Manager (Quantum) and Nomentia should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.