Normative vs Sweep
ESG & sustainability head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Annual subscription, quote-based | Annual subscription, quote-based |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Company size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | None listed | None listed |
| Vendor | Normative | Sweep |
Our take
Where Normative leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 9 of the 30 capabilities where they differ (led by activity-based and spend-based calculation and bulk sku-level pcf calculation).
Where Sweep leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 21 of the 30 capabilities where they differ (led by financed / portfolio emissions and supplier esg/emissions scorecarding).
Where they differ
The 30 capabilities (of 59 in the ESG & sustainability taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Activity-based and spend-based calculationCarbon & GHG Accounting | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Financed / portfolio emissionsCarbon & GHG Accounting | Not evidenced | Core strength Financed-emissions footprints |
| Bulk SKU-level PCF calculationProduct Carbon Footprint & LCA | Core strength Bulk import of BOM exports, spend data, supplier information | Not evidenced |
| PACT-conformant data exchangeProduct Carbon Footprint & LCA | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Product/material scenario modellingProduct Carbon Footprint & LCA | Core strength Material and manufacturing-location scenario modelling | Not evidenced |
| Supplier ESG/emissions scorecardingSupplier & Value Chain Engagement | Not evidenced | Core strength Benchmarking emissions, data quality, climate commitments |
| CBAM import-emissions reportingSupplier & Value Chain Engagement | Core strength EU CBAM reporting for the definitive phase | Not evidenced |
| TCFD/ISSB-aligned reportingRegulatory Disclosure & Reporting | Not evidenced | Core strength |
| US climate disclosure (SEC / SB 253 / SB 261)Regulatory Disclosure & Reporting | Not evidenced | Core strength California SB 253/SB 261 |
| Marginal abatement cost (MAC) curveDecarbonization & Target Management | Not evidenced | Core strength MAC curve ranking of initiatives |
| Decarbonization action plansDecarbonization & Target Management | Not evidenced | Core strength |
| CapEx/OpEx budget integrationDecarbonization & Target Management | Not evidenced | Core strength Year-by-year CapEx/OpEx assessment |
| Automated data quality checksData Collection & Integration | Core strength Automatic checks and AI validation | Not evidenced |
| AI-generated disclosure draftingAI & Automation | Not evidenced | Core strength AI agent drafts disclosure narratives and regulatory responses |
| Role-based access & approval workflowsPlatform & Enterprise Governance | Not evidenced | Core strength Democratizes insights across finance, procurement, ops |
| Life cycle assessment (LCA)Product Carbon Footprint & LCA | Supported ISO 14067-aligned | Not evidenced |
| Collect-once, report-to-manyRegulatory Disclosure & Reporting | Not evidenced | Supported Pre-configured indicators, contextual compliance guidance |
| Reduction scenario / what-if modellingDecarbonization & Target Management | Partial Scenario modelling documented at product/material level | Core strength AI-powered multi-year scenario modelling |
| AI anomaly detectionAI & Automation | Supported Automatic data quality checks and AI validation | Not evidenced |
| Multi-entity / multi-geography consolidationCarbon & GHG Accounting | Supported | Core strength Multi-entity, multi-region, multi-currency consolidation |
| Pre-populated supplier emissions databaseSupplier & Value Chain Engagement | Partial Carbon Network of engaged suppliers, not a documented database | Supported Direct imports from CDP Supply Chain, EcoVadis, S&P, SBTi |
| Self-serve supplier portalSupplier & Value Chain Engagement | Supported Carbon Network | Core strength Free supplier accounts with individual dashboards |
| GRI/SASB-aligned reportingRegulatory Disclosure & Reporting | Supported GRI covered; SASB not named | Core strength |
| CDP questionnaire supportRegulatory Disclosure & Reporting | Supported | Core strength |
| Target progress tracking dashboardsDecarbonization & Target Management | Supported Reduction target tracking per supplier | Core strength Absolute and intensity targets across scopes/entities |
| Automated data ingestionData Collection & Integration | Core strength Templates, direct exports, spend- or activity-based, API | Supported Connectors to procurement systems, ERPs, invoice imports |
| Guided internal data-collection workflowsData Collection & Integration | Supported Data collection request/follow-up (Inbox & Tasks) | Core strength Automated reminders, approval workflows, audit trails |
| Conversational AI assistantAI & Automation | Supported AI assistant explains methodology and emission factors | Core strength Conversational dashboard/data-transformation-rule building |
| AI regulatory guidanceAI & Automation | Supported AI assistant on methodology and emission-factor explanations | Core strength AI agent validates data and recommends emission factors |
| Custom report builderPlatform & Enterprise Governance | Supported Customisable reporting periods and Excel export | Core strength Flexible dashboards and scenario modelling |
Both grade identically on the other 29 capabilities — see each product's full profile: Normative, Sweep.
Normative vs Sweep — FAQs
Is Normative or Sweep better for ERP integration?
They state different ERP coverage: Normative lists no ERP integrations publicly; Sweep lists no ERP integrations publicly.
Which is cheaper, Normative or Sweep?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what Normative and Sweep should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.