Riskonnect vs SAP Audit Management
audit management head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Modular annual subscription, quote-based | Quote-based |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, On-premise |
| Company size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | None listed | SAP |
| Vendor | Riskonnect, Inc. | SAP |
Our take
Where Riskonnect leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 10 of the 16 capabilities where they differ (led by automated / scheduled control testing and continuous controls monitoring).
Where SAP Audit Management leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 6 of the 16 capabilities where they differ (led by audit universe / auditable-entity library and mobile access for fieldwork).
- Stated SAP integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where they differ
The 16 capabilities (of 44 in the audit management taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audit universe / auditable-entity libraryAudit Universe & Planning | Not evidenced | Core strength Flexible, multi-dimensional audit universe |
| Mobile access for fieldworkFieldwork & Workpapers | Not evidenced | Core strength Full mobile-enablement across devices |
| Reviewer sign-off & approval workflowFieldwork & Workpapers | Not evidenced | Core strength Management review workflow for working papers |
| Automated / scheduled control testingControl Testing & SOX Compliance | Core strength Continuous controls testing using RPA and machine learning | Not evidenced |
| Continuous controls monitoringControl Testing & SOX Compliance | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| AI-assisted control or issue analysisAI & Automation | Core strength Continuous controls testing using RPA and machine learning | Not evidenced |
| RPA-based continuous testingAI & Automation | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Prebuilt ERP / HR system connectorsPlatform, Access & Integrations | Not evidenced | Core strength Native embedded module in SAP S/4HANA (GRC-AUD component) |
| Bulk data import / exportPlatform, Access & Integrations | Core strength APIs for data import and export | Not evidenced |
| Overdue-action escalation & alertsFindings & Remediation | Supported Automated task assignment and email reminders | Not evidenced |
| One-click audit committee reportingReporting & Analytics | Not evidenced | Supported Structured process for forming and communicating the audit opinion |
| No-code / custom report builderReporting & Analytics | Supported Customizable reporting | Not evidenced |
| Public / open API for integrationPlatform, Access & Integrations | Supported APIs for data import and export | Not evidenced |
| Controls repository & framework mappingControl Testing & SOX Compliance | Core strength Audit controls design and management | Supported Via integration with SAP Process Control |
| Risk-to-audit-plan linkageRisk Management | Supported | Core strength Audit universe linked to SAP Process Control and SAP Risk Management |
| Real-time executive / board dashboardsReporting & Analytics | Core strength Storyboard-driven dashboards | Supported Real-time audit analytics highlighting high-value issues |
Both grade identically on the other 28 capabilities — see each product's full profile: Riskonnect, SAP Audit Management.
Riskonnect vs SAP Audit Management — FAQs
Is Riskonnect or SAP Audit Management better for ERP integration?
They state different ERP coverage: Riskonnect lists no ERP integrations publicly; SAP Audit Management lists SAP.
Which is cheaper, Riskonnect or SAP Audit Management?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what Riskonnect and SAP Audit Management should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.