CheckAud vs Q Software
access controls & SoD head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Tiered: free assessment, fixed-fee proof of concept, quote-based license | Quote-based |
| Deployment | — | Cloud, On-premise |
| Company size | Mid-market, Enterprise | — |
| Stated ERP integrations | SAP | Oracle Fusion Cloud |
| Vendor | IBS Schreiber GmbH | Q Software (a Pathlock company) |
Our take
Where CheckAud leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 12 of the 18 capabilities where they differ (led by cross-system risk analysis and usage-based risk prioritization).
- Stated SAP integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where Q Software leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 6 of the 18 capabilities where they differ (led by license usage optimization and remediation workflow routing).
- Stated Oracle Fusion Cloud integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where they differ
The 18 capabilities (of 51 in the access controls & SoD taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cross-system risk analysisAccess Risk & SoD Analysis | Core strength Multi-client and multi-system (cross-landscape) analysis | Not evidenced |
| Usage-based risk prioritizationAccess Risk & SoD Analysis | Core strength "Did-Do" analysis of actual user activity from system logs, distinct from "Can-Do" excess-permission analysis | Not evidenced |
| License usage optimizationLicensing & Cost Optimization | Not evidenced | Core strength Oracle license audit and usage-compliance services |
| SAP S/4HANA migration readinessPlatform, AI & Deployment | Core strength SAP S/4HANA migration authorization validation and role-concept clean-up | Not evidenced |
| Non-invasive deploymentPlatform, AI & Deployment | Core strength Plug-and-play analysis of exported SAP data; no modification to the production system | Not evidenced |
| Custom rule authoringAccess Risk & SoD Analysis | Supported Support for custom risk rule sets | Not evidenced |
| Impact-ranked remediation planningSimulation, Testing & Remediation | Supported Management-level risk dashboards with prioritized findings | Not evidenced |
| Remediation workflow routingSimulation, Testing & Remediation | Not evidenced | Supported Mitigating-control tracking for accepted risks |
| Continuous / real-time access reviewUser Access Review & Certification | Supported Continuous, recurring compliance-monitoring option | Not evidenced |
| Least-privilege role designRole Design & Identity Provisioning | Supported Role-concept clean-up ahead of migration | Not evidenced |
| Executive risk dashboardsReporting & Compliance | Supported Management-level risk dashboards with prioritized findings | Not evidenced |
| Historical audit trailReporting & Compliance | Not evidenced | Supported Historical audit trail reporting |
| Fraud detection monitoringReporting & Compliance | Not evidenced | Supported Fraud detection and prevention monitoring |
| API connectivityPlatform, AI & Deployment | Supported Interfaces for data export and system-to-system comparison | Not evidenced |
| Prebuilt risk rule libraryAccess Risk & SoD Analysis | Supported Reference rule sets covering DSAG, GDPR and SOX-relevant controls, plus IBS Schreiber-supplied sets | Core strength Prebuilt rule library for Oracle and JDE business processes |
| Periodic access certification campaignsUser Access Review & Certification | Supported Continuous, recurring compliance-monitoring option available | Core strength Periodic security and role assessments; Oracle EBS/Cloud and JDE user access reviews |
| Unused-access cost identificationLicensing & Cost Optimization | Partial "Can-Do" analysis surfaces excessive/unused permissions but no license-cost framing | Not evidenced |
| Multi-system / cross-landscape supportPlatform, AI & Deployment | Core strength Multi-client and multi-system cross-landscape analysis | Supported Covers both Oracle E-Business Suite/ERP Cloud and JD Edwards (EnterpriseOne and World) |
Both grade identically on the other 33 capabilities — see each product's full profile: CheckAud, Q Software.
CheckAud vs Q Software — FAQs
Is CheckAud or Q Software better for ERP integration?
They state different ERP coverage: CheckAud lists SAP; Q Software lists Oracle Fusion Cloud.
Which is cheaper, CheckAud or Q Software?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what CheckAud and Q Software should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.