Drata vs Hyperproof
SOX & internal controls head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Annual subscription, quote-based by headcount, frameworks and modules | Annual subscription, quote-based by users and modules |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Company size | Startup, Growth-stage, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | None listed | None listed |
| Vendor | Drata | Hyperproof |
Our take
Where Drata leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 5 of the 13 capabilities where they differ (led by it general controls (itgc) monitoring and public trust center / posture sharing).
Where Hyperproof leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 8 of the 13 capabilities where they differ (led by risk-to-control linkage and risk scoring (likelihood / impact)).
Where they differ
The 13 capabilities (of 44 in the SOX & internal controls taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Risk-to-control linkageControl Library & Documentation | Not evidenced | Core strength Map risks to mitigating controls in the register |
| IT general controls (ITGC) monitoringContinuous Controls Monitoring | Core strength SOX ITGC listed as a pre-built framework with continuous testing | Not evidenced |
| Risk scoring (likelihood / impact)Risk Management | Not evidenced | Core strength Customizable risk assessment scales |
| PBC (prepared-by-client) request trackingAudit Management & Evidence | Not evidenced | Core strength Evidence requests assigned to owners with status tracking (outstanding/in progress/done) |
| Public trust center / posture sharingPolicy Management & Framework Coverage | Core strength Dedicated Trust Center with approved-domain access and NDA workflows | Not evidenced |
| Periodic user access review / certificationSegregation of Duties & Access Governance | Not evidenced | Supported User access review automation |
| Risk dashboards & reportingRisk Management | Not evidenced | Supported Exportable risk dashboards and reports |
| Employee policy attestation trackingPolicy Management & Framework Coverage | Not evidenced | Supported Employee acknowledgment tracking |
| SOX 302 / 404 program supportSOX Program & Testing Management | Partial SOX ITGC pre-built framework only; not full 302/404 financial-statement scoping | Not evidenced |
| Findings tracking & remediation workflowSOX Program & Testing Management | Partial Task management tied to control/framework status; no explicit deficiency workflow evidenced | Supported Auto-created tasks on control test failure |
| Configuration & change trackingContinuous Controls Monitoring | Partial Compliance-as-code integrations for infrastructure-level checks | Not evidenced |
| Centralized evidence repositoryAudit Management & Evidence | Core strength Centralized evidence repository for annual SOX audit support | Supported |
| AI-assisted testing & evidence reviewPlatform & Integrations | Supported AI-drafted security-questionnaire responses; AI agent governance | Core strength Hyperproof AI: Act/Advise/Ask agents plus auto-generated evidence summaries |
Both grade identically on the other 31 capabilities — see each product's full profile: Drata, Hyperproof.
Drata vs Hyperproof — FAQs
Is Drata or Hyperproof better for ERP integration?
They state different ERP coverage: Drata lists no ERP integrations publicly; Hyperproof lists no ERP integrations publicly.
Which is cheaper, Drata or Hyperproof?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what Drata and Hyperproof should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.