Checkout.com vs CSG Forte
payment processing head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Quote-based (flat-rate or Interchange++) | Quote-based |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Company size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | None listed | QuickBooks |
| Vendor | Checkout.com | CSG Forte |
Our take
Where Checkout.com leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 17 of the 28 capabilities where they differ (led by local & alternative payment methods and ecommerce storefront plugins).
Where CSG Forte leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 11 of the 28 capabilities where they differ (led by ach / bank transfer processing and ivr / phone payment acceptance).
- Stated QuickBooks integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where they differ
The 28 capabilities (of 50 in the payment processing taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| ACH / bank transfer processingPayment Acceptance & Channels | Not evidenced | Core strength ACH/eCheck with Standard and Same Day ACH; Direct Fund Recovery re-presentment |
| Local & alternative payment methodsPayment Acceptance & Channels | Core strength iDEAL, POLi, Przelewy24 and other local methods | Not evidenced |
| IVR / phone payment acceptancePayment Acceptance & Channels | Not evidenced | Core strength IVR phone payments with customizable business rules |
| Ecommerce storefront pluginsPayment Acceptance & Channels | Core strength Plugins for Shopify, Magento, BigCommerce, WooCommerce and more | Not evidenced |
| Multi-currency processingGlobal Reach & Money Movement | Core strength 150+ processing currencies, 20 settlement currencies | Not evidenced |
| Direct / domestic acquiringGlobal Reach & Money Movement | Core strength Direct acquiring licenses in UK/EEA, US, APAC, MENAP; 57 domestic processing countries | Not evidenced |
| Cross-border FX & treasuryGlobal Reach & Money Movement | Core strength Treasury & FX management | Not evidenced |
| 3-D Secure / strong customer authenticationFraud, Risk & Authentication | Core strength 3DS authentication with liability shift | Not evidenced |
| Chargeback & dispute managementFraud, Risk & Authentication | Core strength Dispute management with Visa Rapid Dispute Resolution | Not evidenced |
| Marketplace / multi-party split paymentsEmbedded Finance & Platform Payments | Core strength Split payments at authorization, capture or refund | Not evidenced |
| Card issuingEmbedded Finance & Platform Payments | Core strength Physical and virtual Visa/Mastercard programs with spend controls | Not evidenced |
| PCI DSS Level 1 certified infrastructureTokenization & Security | Not evidenced | Core strength PCI DSS Level 1 and SOC 2 Type II certified infrastructure |
| Network tokenizationTokenization & Security | Core strength Network Tokens for encrypted, updateable card credentials | Not evidenced |
| In-person POS hardwarePayment Acceptance & Channels | Not evidenced | Supported EMV, contactless and P2PE terminals |
| Electronic invoicing with embedded paymentBilling & Receivables | Not evidenced | Supported Electronic bill payment / billing solutions |
| Automated dunning & retryBilling & Receivables | Not evidenced | Supported Direct Fund Recovery: automated NSF/ACH re-presentment |
| PayFac-as-a-ServiceEmbedded Finance & Platform Payments | Supported Sub-merchant onboarding with automated KYC/KYB, configurable commissions | Not evidenced |
| Point-to-point encryption (P2PE)Tokenization & Security | Not evidenced | Supported P2PE terminals |
| Automated payment reconciliationReporting & Reconciliation | Supported Automated settlement reconciliation; centralized reconciliation across platform participants | Not evidenced |
| Data export & BI connectivityReporting & Reconciliation | Not evidenced | Supported Multi-format export (PDF/XLSX/CSV) and API access for BI/data-warehouse tools |
| WebhooksDeveloper Platform & Checkout Tools | Not evidenced | Supported Webhook integration patterns for ERP/CRM/billing systems |
| Sandbox / test environmentDeveloper Platform & Checkout Tools | Not evidenced | Supported REST API with sandbox environment and code samples |
| Digital wallet acceptancePayment Acceptance & Channels | Core strength Apple Pay, PayPal, Alipay and other wallets | Supported Apple Pay, Google Pay, PayPal |
| Identity verification & sanctions screeningFraud, Risk & Authentication | Core strength AI-powered identity verification, sanctions/PEP/adverse-media screening | Supported Payment verification, validation and account-ownership authentication |
| Automatic account / card updaterFraud, Risk & Authentication | Supported Real-Time Account Updater | Core strength Account Updater for Visa, Mastercard and Discover |
| Tokenized card vaultTokenization & Security | Core strength Vault for secure card tokenization and data storage | Supported Tokenization to reduce merchant PCI scope |
| REST API & SDKsDeveloper Platform & Checkout Tools | Core strength Unified Payments API | Supported REST API with sandbox environment |
| Hosted / embeddable checkout componentsDeveloper Platform & Checkout Tools | Core strength Flow, Hosted Payment Page | Supported Forte Checkout hosted/embeddable payment form |
Both grade identically on the other 22 capabilities — see each product's full profile: Checkout.com, CSG Forte.
Checkout.com vs CSG Forte — FAQs
Is Checkout.com or CSG Forte better for ERP integration?
They state different ERP coverage: Checkout.com lists no ERP integrations publicly; CSG Forte lists QuickBooks.
Which is cheaper, Checkout.com or CSG Forte?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what Checkout.com and CSG Forte should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.